 |
| Photo from CyclingNews.com |
I was pretty suprised that
Alexandre Vinokourov (riding for Astana)
won Sunday's Liège - Bastogne - Liège. The last of the spring classics on the calendar. I knew he was racing, and I knew he was on form from his win at Giro del Trentino. But I just didn't think he could have pulled off a win against such a strong field.
Regardless, he won. And it seems that it is causing some distress with fans of bike racing around the world.
Count from one to ten. That's how long it would take Gunnar Soroos to outsprint you... Fourty seven times.
Vino, served a 2 year suspension from pro racing for
failing a doping control test following a win in the first time trial in the 2007 Tour de France, suggesting that he received blood transfusions for performance gain.
Now, he never admitted wrong doing, but he also didn't seem to fight the claims. He served his suspension.
He is considered a doper. And I don't doubt that he cheated. So when people see his win on Sunday, they see a cheat winning. But here's the thing, is he still a cheat because he cheated in the past? I'm not saying to not question his cleanliness, but I am wondering if we should be so focused and upset because a rider who served a suspension won.
It seems almost every week there is news of another rider testing postive for some sort of cheating. I don't think that that is going away soon. And just like fines for unsportsmanlike behavior, once the punishment is paid, shuldn't the rider be able to continue to race if he chooses to? (Considering he can get on a team)
If the punishment isn't strong enough, then maybe the rules need to be changed to reflect that, but untill they are, he's not breaking any rule by racing.
On the other hand, I want to know the riders that are winning, are real champions. I don't want to think a rider may be on the podium because he has chemicals in, or is using someone elses blood.
Of course it comes down to the fact that, if a rider wins by artificial means, it not only takes away from his win, it takes away from my own (rather small) accomplishments. Doesn't it? Cycling isn't that hard, just take some
EPO. Training and commitment isn't important. Just purchase a victory.
Really I don't know where this little rant is going, or what point I'm making, but it's a tough nut to crack when you think about it. Should I be happy that a doper won? Should I not care? Should I be happy that a rider served his suspension and is now clean, as he claims? What other riders are cheats?
I really don't know. I do know that I want the sport to be clean, and that I want the winners of every race to win honestly.
Because of this I support
Bike Pure, and
Dopers Suck. I know for myself, at my level, I am racing as ethically as possible. Does that make sense? What about you? Are you racing clean?